Computer Games Forum
 

Go Back   Computer Games Forum > Tech > Foto

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 20-05-2007, 19:20   #121
Registered User
 
Elven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bucuresti
Foarte important pt orice incepator care este vrajit de ISOurile astronomice ale P&Surile noi http://www.dpreview.com/articles/compactcamerahighiso/
__________________
Dragos Jianu PHOTOGRAPHY

 
Elven is offline    Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2007, 21:28   #122
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: bucharest
am vazut si eu exagerarea asta absurda la mai toate aparatele noi
am vazut si aparat cu 6400(cu 3200 deja sunt multe :P )
 
avinersan is offline    Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2007, 10:50   #123
Mir
Super Moderator
 
Mir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Darkroom
The Megapixel Masquerade

http://www.steves-digicams.com/techcorner/aug_2007.html
 
Mir is offline    Reply With Quote
Old 26-08-2007, 21:09   #124
Mir
Super Moderator
 
Mir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Darkroom
http://blog.frozeninstant.com/tag/ph...hic-technique/
 
Mir is offline    Reply With Quote
Old 16-09-2007, 03:19   #125
Registered User
 
ixtl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
La ce sunt importanti megapixelii cu adevarat. Si nu prea...
__________________
This space is intentionally left blank
 
ixtl is offline    Reply With Quote
Old 14-10-2007, 14:44   #126
Registered User
 
ixtl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Pentru cei mai incepatori care lucreaza sau vor sa lucreze RAW.
Cei avansati au invatat probabil pe propria piele lucrurile astea
__________________
This space is intentionally left blank
 
ixtl is offline    Reply With Quote
Old 16-10-2007, 17:56   #127
Nick anterior: Agent 47
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Cam offtopic, dar cei care fac, de exemplu, albumele în cls. a XII-a, lucrează tot în Photoshop? Fiindcă mă mir cum de se poate face aşa ceva, arată foarte bine
__________________
640509-040147

I don't know if it's art, but I like it.
 
Bianor is offline    Reply With Quote
Old 16-10-2007, 19:53   #128
The Other Side
 
BlonduGL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: DanceValley
Am niste cursuri foto, Manual de tehnica fotografica, Univ. Ioan I. Dalles. E bazat foarte mult pe teorie. Pentru cine e interesat sa-mi dea un pm cu adresa de email.
__________________
"To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems." -Homer Simpson

Last edited by BlonduGL; 16-10-2007 at 20:03.
 
BlonduGL is offline    Reply With Quote
Old 16-10-2007, 20:51   #129
Registered User
 
Gabi Udrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Earth
E ce se poate lua si de aici ( http://photocami.ro/curs.html ) sau ai ceva in plus ?
__________________
"Prin urmare, tot ceea ce vreti sa va faca voua oamenii, faceti-le si voi la fel !"
>Matei 7*12
 
Gabi Udrea is offline    Reply With Quote
Old 16-10-2007, 23:02   #130
Building Communism
 
Jigodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ....Niciunde.... Posts: -1
Thanks Mir si baieti pentru acest thread superb.
Am gasit numai lucruri utile.
Inca odata va multumesc!
 
Jigodie is online now    Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2007, 12:37   #131
The Other Side
 
BlonduGL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: DanceValley
Gabi Udrea - e acelasi
__________________
"To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems." -Homer Simpson
 
BlonduGL is offline    Reply With Quote
Old 28-11-2007, 00:52   #132
Registered User
 
ixtl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Quote:
Threads like this never cease to amaze me. The level of stupidity, foolishness, and shortsightedness that comes out in these things is truly staggering.

1) It is NOT all about image quality. It is NOT all about any 1 thing actually. We buy our equipment based on our own needs, budgets, and preferences. As long as we are educated consumers and are purchasing equipment that makes sense to us, who is anyone else to tell me, you, or anyone else that our logic is faulty.

2) We all have different preferences. Landscape shooters don't need anything more than 1 frame per second. Studio portrait photogs could give a rats sphincter about high ISO noise since they will be shooting no higher than ISO 100. Sports shooters demand the most out of their cameras, much more than any other style shooter, and there are aspects of their cameras they wouldn't give a second thought to as well. Everyone is different, everyone's needs are different. If you can't fathom that or just plain refuse to accept it ... get off the Internet, this whole "mingling" thing isn't for you.

With that said, if someone came up to me right now and said, "Bill, you can buy a D300 for $1800 or I can give you a 40D for free" ... the answer would be the D300. Why? Because I need a weather sealed camera. Simple answer isn't it? I need a weather sealed camera which the D300 is and the 40D isn't.

I was a Canon shooter for 15 years. But the time came for a body upgrade and my weather-proofed choices were the D200, D2x, 1DmII, 1Ds mII. That was it. I've said it before and I'll say it again ... I would take a D200 over a 5D any and every day of the week. Every single "grainy" high-iso pictures my D200 takes when wet is infinitely better than the dead electronics a 5D would have in the same conditions. End of story. To some of you, weather proofing means nothing and I'm all fine and dandy with that. Whatever body you chose, as long as it does the job for you ... great. I couldn't care less.

You measurbaters will attack me and call me a moron, but I have the pleasure of not being an internet-argument-junkie trolling website looking for any and every excuse to validate my purchase. Most of those who've argumented here in this thread and the countless others that compare 1 camera to another are doing just that ...arguing to validate their own expenditure and/or are trying desperately to be propelled to internet stardom by being a righteous defender of and advocate of your own brand and product. Case in point, if the OP really didn't understand why us Nikonians like the D300, the basic principals of common sense would have pointed him/her to posting his question in the D300 forum, not a Canon forum. You already spent your money, give it a rest.

Then there are the random posts arguing that the D300 takes horrible pictures. First ... what do you care? Do you own one? Are you miffed at Nikon? What exactly is your problem?

Second ... what pictures are you looking at? I've seen ISO 1600 and 3200 examples and compared them directly to the 40D - the D300 shows approximately the same amount of noise as the 40D at those ISOs. I would say the D300 looks better, but I had to actually blow the photos up to 100% to see that difference and you know what ... looking at any photo at 100% for any reason other than to determine point of focus/check-sharpness is dumb ... truly stupid. The pixel peepers who engage is this senseless time-waster probably print very little and measure the "quality" of their photos not by the impact it has on its viewer, but rather by how technically correct the image is and how little noise is or isn't apparent.

If you're someone who feels insulted by this post, then I assume something has hit a little too near to home. So do me a favor and read the last sentence in that last paragraph again. It's not about the noise, its not about the corner sharpness, it's not about a speck of flare ... it's about taking a picture of a child today that makes his/her parents cry 10 years from now when they're flipping through an old photo album. It's about a 40 year old woman proudly showing off her wedding album to her 10 year old daughter and that daughter saying, "Wow mom, you looked INCREDIBLE ... and whoah - dad had HAIR!".

I'm in the mall one day hanging out with my son while my wife is trying on an outfit in the fitting room. I roll my son's stroller over to a mirror and watch him look strangely into the mirror - he's about a year old at the time. I happen to have my D200 with 50mm around my neck when I catch him kissing himself in the mirror. With not a second to waste, I turn the dial to throw the aperture wide open, hit the button and turn the ISO all the way up (was dim in this store, didn't know how much ISO or aperture I would need, so I just took all I could get) and fired off two shots before my son realized he was kissing glass and not a person.

This photo is very noisy, the color is off, it's not sharp, it's very flat, and the composition could have been better .... but that all means nothing. It is the photo most requested by family members and friends who want a picture of my son, not to mention the half-dozen 8x10s I've made of it for my desk, my wife's desk, our wall, and few other places I keep a copy. This photo conveys the essence of all that is pure and simple and loving in my son and this photo, regardless of its technical flaws, will forever be in my home. That's what photography is about. When you've understood that, you'll put the ruler down and stop measurbating.

...
__________________
This space is intentionally left blank
 
ixtl is offline    Reply With Quote
Old 15-01-2008, 22:44   #133
Registered User
 
razclud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: din pacate bucuresti
Foarte dragute pozele Mir
Ce lumina ai folosit in poza asta? http://www.badorgood.com/detail.php?id=43800
__________________
" Aia e puternici! "
 
razclud is offline    Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 19:49   #134
Son of the Morning-Angel of light
 
gigi19lic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: bucuresti - braila
- sunt incepator si am gasit cateva raspunsuri la intrebarile mele aici: http://www.cs.duke.edu/~parr/photography/faq.html
--------------------
Editare ulterioară
--------------------
- pentru incepatori, dar "read with your eyes wide open and use at your own risk": http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page

- Din cate am vazut si testat merge, insa nu pot garanta ce efect asupra calitatii pozelor facute cu multi megapixeli pe un senzor "mini" va avea, dar macar poti mari timpul de expunere de la 15s si salvezi RAW...

PS. Poate s-a mai discutat desi am rasfoit cat de cat thread-ul dar mai bine de doua ori decat lipsa.
__________________
barton 2400+M/thermalright ALX800/NIDEC 92mm/2x256 corsair 2.2.2.5 old bh-5/abit AN7/asus 9600xt/hdd WD 80gb/Samsung writemaster SH-S182M/BEWE/antec sp-500p 500w

Last edited by gigi19lic; 12-03-2008 at 20:08. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
 
gigi19lic is offline    Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2008, 20:46   #135
Registered User
 
andymandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
la un aparat cu stabilizator de imagine (in speta un canon s5), mai este nevoie de trepied pentru pozele de noapte?
 
andymandy is offline    Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2008, 21:14   #136
Registered User
 
marqq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stau bine...nu ma plang
sigur ca da. Cu stabilizare castigi cateva stopuri dar nu vei putea face expuneri de 1s sau mai mari
__________________
Copilul intinde din leagan mainile dupa luna. In clipa cand simte ca luna i se refuza, el o vede frumoasa. Adineauri ea lucea doar.

Canon 5D + BG E4, Canon 350D silver + BG E3 + ecran de focus Haoda, Canon G5
AF: Canon EF-S 18-55, f/3.5-5.6, Canon EF 28-70 f/3.5-4.5 mII, Canon EF 50 f/1.4 USM,
M42 CZJ S 135mm f/3.5 MC, Helios44m-4 58mm f/2
Canon Speedlite 430EX

DE VANZARE: Mir 1B 37mm f/2.8
 
marqq is offline    Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2008, 22:20   #137
Registered User
 
ali3nmarte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Outer Space
si eu iti recomand ca la expuneri lungi sa dezactivezi IS-ul, e posibil ca la miscari alea vantului, sa-ti miste lentilele in interior si pozele sa apara miscate, desi aparatul e fost fixat pe trepied
__________________
|| Gigabyte GA-7N400 || AMD Athlon XP 2500+ Barton@2.00Ghz/TiTAN CU5TB || 2x512 DDR400 Kingmax ||
|| GeCube X1600Pro || Creative Sound Blaster Audigy LS || ASUS DRW-1608P3S || Maxtor DiamondMax10 160gb ||

|| Canon 400D || Canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS || Canon 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III ||
 
ali3nmarte is offline    Reply With Quote
Old 18-03-2008, 08:44   #138
Mir
Super Moderator
 
Mir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Darkroom
Quote:
Originally Posted by razclud View Post
Foarte dragute pozele Mir
Ce lumina ai folosit in poza asta? http://www.badorgood.com/detail.php?id=43800
Merci.

Am folosit doua blitzuri de studio Excela Prisma 1000Ws cu umbrele.
 
Mir is offline    Reply With Quote
Old 23-03-2008, 13:50   #139
Registered User
 
kpk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: f2-f4
Inele macro &...
http://www.aperture.ro/
__________________
Galerie personala
 
kpk1 is online now    Send Message via Google Talk to kpk1 Reply With Quote
Old 30-03-2008, 14:09   #140
Registered User
 
andymandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
salut,
un link in care este explicata clasificarea obiectivelor si ce reprezinta de fapt cifrele astea 18 - 55 mm, 17 - 40 mm etc.?
merci
 
andymandy is offline    Reply With Quote
Advertisment
Reply

  Computer Games Forum > Tech > Foto

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +3. The time now is 00:03.


Advertisement System V2.3 By   Branden
This site is copyrighted ©1997 - 2008, Computer Games Online SRL